This information is taken from an index to the deadline 2 written representations from the examination library for Sunnica.
The written representation from Say No To Sunnica is REP2-240 and the annexes are REP2-240 a-o.
- REP2-240 – Full written representation from Say No To Sunnica (69 pages)
- REP2-240a – Summary of written represenytation (17 pages)
- REP2-240b – Landscape and Visual Impact (136 pages)
- REP2-240c – Heritage Impact (107 pages)
- REP2-240d – Agricultural Land Classification & Impacts (298 pages)
- REP2-240e – Ecology and Biodiversity (127 pages)
- REP2-240f – Impact on Horse Racing Industry (118 pages)
- REP2-240g – Carbon Footprint (63 pages)
- REP2-240h – Inadequacy of Consultation (84 pages)
- REP2-240i – BESS (12 pages)
- REP2-240j – Critique of the Applicant’s Funding Statement
- REP2-240k – Contribution of Horse Breeding to UK Economy (102 pages)
- REP2-240l – Economic Contribution of Horseracing (48 pages)
- REP2-240m – Battery Fire Safety Planning (10 pages)
- REP2-240n – Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales (60 pages)
- REP2-240o – Natural England Technical Information Note TIN04
The final PINS opinion can be found at https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/EN010106/EN010106-005902-Sunnica-ExA-Recommendation-Report-28-June-2023-FINAL-with%20Errata%20sheet.pdf#page333